Eddy-current dynamometers
Simple, inexpensive and low-maintenance, but they can only absorb power, never drive the unit under test. Response is comparatively slow and all the energy leaves as heat in the cooling water. They suit steady-state characterisation, endurance runs and production stations with modest dynamic requirements.
AC dynamometers
The mainstream choice for motor and e-drive testing today. Four-quadrant operation means they both absorb and drive, response is in the millisecond range, and a regenerative drive returns energy to the grid — which makes long endurance programmes markedly cheaper to run than an eddy-current bench. The trade-off is higher capital cost and stricter requirements on harmonics and site distribution.
DC dynamometers
Straightforward control and smooth low-speed torque, but commutators and brushes need regular maintenance and top speed is limited. Today they are mostly seen as installed equipment in existing laboratories and in low-speed, high-torque applications.
Making the decision
If the programme requires driving the unit under test — motoring tests, back-driven efficiency measurement, real drive-cycle simulation — a four-quadrant AC machine is mandatory. If the work is steady-state loading on a limited budget, eddy current is still valid. The more operating hours per year, the sooner regenerated energy pays back the price difference.
장비에 맞는 구성과 견적이 필요하십니까? 시험 엔지니어가 1영업일 이내에 회신드립니다.
엔지니어와 상담